Current:Home > MySupreme Court Halts Clean Power Plan, with Implications Far Beyond the U.S. -ProsperPlan Hub
Supreme Court Halts Clean Power Plan, with Implications Far Beyond the U.S.
View
Date:2025-04-27 20:06:13
The Supreme Court put on hold the linchpin of President Obama’s climate policy, barring the Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday from carrying out the administration’s new Clean Power Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from electric power plants.
It was a surprising decision of staggering proportions, with repercussions that go far beyond the U.S. electrical grid, threatening the credibility of the Paris Agreement on climate change reached by the world’s nations in December.
The Clean Power Plan, designed to reduce by nearly a third emissions from fossil fuel-burning electricity plants, is the central element of the pledge by the United States to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by at least 26 percent by 2025.
It was an unusual intervention by the Supreme Court, given that a powerful appeals court had just weeks ago turned down a request by dozens of states and their allies in the fossil fuel industries to impose a stay on the new federal regulation.
By blocking enforcement of the rule, the justices sent a signal that conservatives on the court may be inclined to limit the agency’s powers under the Clean Air Act. The Supreme Court found in its 2007 decision Massachusetts v. EPA that the statute allows controls on carbon dioxide emissions that cause global warming.
It would have taken years for the Clean Power Plan to take full effect, but the first step would have been for states to file implementation plans starting in September. Planning was well under way for that. About half the states had joined in appealing the rule, and some of them had declared that they would have refused to file state plans. Now, none of them will have to meet the rule’s deadlines, which the EPA will be powerless to enforce.
SCOTUSblog, an authoritative web site covering the Supreme Court, said that the order “will delay all parts of the plan, including all deadlines that would stretch on into 2030, until after the D.C. Circuit completes its review and the Supreme Court has finished, if the case does wind up there. There appears to be little chance for those two stages of review to be over by the time President Obama’s term ends next January 20.”
Josh Earnest, the White House spokesman, said “we remain confident that we will prevail on the merits.” He said the EPA would continue working with those states that want to move ahead with pollution controls under the rule.
“I am extremely disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision,” said Attorney General Kamala Harris of California, one of 17 states that argued in favor of the rule in the appeals court. “The Court’s decision, and the special interests working to undermine this plan, threatens our environment, public health and economy.”
West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey, whose state is the lead plaintiff challenging the rule, said “we are thrilled” by the “great victory.”
But environmental advocacy groups said they were confident that the rule would eventually pass judicial muster, and that in the meantime the trend toward greener power would continue.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has scheduled arguments for June and is expected to rule by late summer or early fall. An appeal to the Supreme Court would most likely be decided next year, after President Obama is out of office.
“We are confident the courts will ultimately uphold the Clean Power Plan on its merits,” said David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “The electricity sector has embarked on an unstoppable shift from its high-pollution, dirty-fueled past to a safer, cleaner-powered future, and the stay cannot reverse that trend.”
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
Ranking
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
Recommendation
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast